1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the plaintiffs' claims changed in the trial, is modified as follows. A.

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From March 1, 2002, the Defendant is an incorporated educational foundation operating a F University; Plaintiff A is a professor of Korean medicine at the F University; Plaintiff B is a professor of the Social and Social Studies University; Plaintiff C is a professor of the cultural content department at the F University from March 1, 1994; Plaintiff C is a professor of the cultural content department at the N University; and Plaintiff D is a professor of the cultural content department at the cultural content department at the N University from March 1, 1994.

B. On March 13, 2015, the Defendant demanded the F University Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee to make a resolution on the Plaintiffs on the grounds as follows; and on July 1, 2015, following the resolution of the Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee, the Defendant issued a disposition of removal from each office to Plaintiff A, B, and C and the disposition of suspension from office to Plaintiff D for two months on July 9, 2015.

(hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant disciplinary action”). Plaintiff A of the grounds for disciplinary action

1. The fact that it improperly uses the school expenses budget, such as use for other purposes, with respect to the school expenses, at the time of employment of the student support director (from November 4, 2010 to September 1, 2013);

2. The fact that he/she interferes with school administration and schedule by participating in an in-school meeting to refuse to give character education on September 4, 2014 and September 15, 2014;

3. The fact that he/she interferes with business affairs without permission by entering the meeting place of the board of directors at around 11:00 on November 25, 2014;

4. The fact that he/she interferes with the affairs of disciplinary action by entering the meeting room of the teachers' disciplinary committee without permission on November 13, 2014;

5. The fact that a person defames a school at a school assembly held by the majority (referring to August 18, 2014; October 6, 2014; January 22, 2015);

6. Plaintiff B: The fact that the Plaintiff interfered with the affairs of the Student Disciplinary Committee and instigates students on December 3, 2014 is identical with the grounds of disciplinary action 3 and 4 with respect to Plaintiff A, and that the Plaintiff slandered the school at a meeting of a majority (on August 19, 2014, October 1, 2014, and January 22, 2015) and instigated students C

1. The fact that he/she poorly managed and supervised the progress of the miscellaneous program at the time of his/her employment as the planning director (from November 4, 2010 to September 1, 2013);

2.Design matters that have been consulted with the Korea Foundation for the Promotion of Private School in connection with the new construction of public dormitories at the time of service;