logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.04.12 2016고단30
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 14, 2015, the Defendant: (a) tried to drive a breath on the main points of “D” operated by the victim C in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) recommended the victim to return home, and (c) caused the victim to do so.

피고인은 “ 이 씹할 놈 원 투로 꽂아 삔다.

N. L. L. L. L. L. L. L. L.W.

Along with the large sound called "Chewing gue", the disturbance was avoided, and the customer was in the above main point.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force.

2. On December 14, 2015, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) on December 14, 2015, the Defendant: (b) on the F, who solicited the Defendant to return home to the police station E boxes belonging to the Mapo-gu Police Station E boxes called out after receiving a report on the said D, and thereby solicits him to return home to the Defendant.

“Along with sound.”

In addition, F was at one time at the right face of F due to a person who gets out of the above main point and gets out of the elevator using the elevator.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and F;

1. Application of the G’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the obstruction of business, the choice of imprisonment), and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties and the choice of imprisonment);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria: Imprisonment for six months to one year and eight months; and

(a) Basic crime: Interference with the execution of official duties [the scope of a recommendation] and interference with the execution of official duties, and the basic area (six months to one year and four months) (no person subject to special sentencing];

(b) Concurrent Crimes: Interference with the duties (the scope of recommendations) and interference with the duties (the scope of punishment). The mitigation area (one month to eight months) (the person with a special mitigation).

arrow