logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.10.31 2018가단521852
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff each of the relevant real estate listed in the separate sheet.

2. Each of the costs of lawsuit.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

(a) The reasons for the claim are as shown in the annex;

(b) Defendant C: A without any dispute, entry in the evidence No. 1 through 4 2) Defendant B: Defendant D (Article 208(3) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Act). Defendant D: Judgment by service by publication (Article 208(3) and (3) of the Civil Procedure Act).

2. The Defendants, as the members or tenants who filed an application for parcelling-out with the Plaintiff, are not eligible for compensation for losses under the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation therefor (person eligible for cash settlement) under Article 81(1)2 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), and thus, are obligated to deliver each of the relevant real estate listed in the attached Table possessed by them pursuant to Article 81(

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is justified and all of them are accepted.

arrow