logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.10.31 2018가단514335
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Defendants deliver to the Plaintiff each of the relevant real estate listed in the separate sheet.

2. Each of the costs of lawsuit.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

(a) The reasons for the claim are as shown in the annex;

On the other hand, the compensation procedure was completed against Defendant E.

(b) Defendant D, E: The absence of dispute, and entry of evidence A1 through 7 2) Defendant B and C: Confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. The judgment of Defendant D, as an association member who applied for a parcelling-out to the Plaintiff, does not constitute a person eligible for compensation for losses under the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation therefor (person eligible for cash settlement) under Article 81(1)2 of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”). Thus, Defendant D is obligated to deliver real estate possessed by the Plaintiff pursuant to Article

Ultimately, the Defendants are obligated to deliver each of the pertinent real estate listed in the separate sheet possessed by the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is justified and all of them are accepted.

arrow