1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The defendant asserts that the lawsuit of this case does not have a benefit of protection of rights since the decision on the main defense of this case was made by B, who was the founder of the instant hospital, and that there was no

In full view of the overall purport of the statements and arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit and asserted that “B established the instant hospital in the real estate owned by the Plaintiff, but thereafter did not obtain permission for modification despite the modification of the matters regarding the permission to establish a medical institution, such as the establishment of the instant hospital, which was disposed of by auction, etc., after the instant disposition,” and that “B seeks revocation of the instant disposition.” However, on April 15, 2015, it can be acknowledged that the report on closure of the business was accepted by reporting the closure of the business with respect to the instant hospital to the Changwon City Mayor on April 15,

According to the above facts, the plaintiff has no legal interest in seeking the revocation of the disposition of this case, and the lawsuit of this case is unlawful.

2. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices who reviewed the instant lawsuit.