logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.08.29 2013고단1260
상습사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No person who violates the Resident Registration Act shall unlawfully use another person's resident registration number;

On February 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) opened a virtual account by using the resident registration numbers of D, E, F, G, and H in order to receive money to be acquired as a crime of fraud in the skin bank near the river basin located in Gangnam-gu, Seoul; and (b) opened a virtual account after having become a member of the website of the item transaction online, using the resident registration numbers of D, E, F, G, and H.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

2. Habitual fraud;

A. On February 14, 2013, the Defendant posted a false article to the effect that he/she connects a computer to the “Nber I,” a transaction site for used goods from the Internet, which is an online medium-sized goods, to sell the “rupture home,” which is an infant’s goods.

However, there is no intention or ability to sell infant supplies.

The Defendant, habitually deceiving the Victim J of this article, and then, he received 90,000 won from the victim to the virtual account in the name of K, from the victim, and acquired 4,725,000 won in total over 42 times from March 18, 2013 through the same method, such as the list of crimes, from March 18, 2013.

(However, in the column of the crime method No. 3 of the crime list, the term “Korea Bank” shall be corrected to “agricultural Cooperatives”. (b)

On March 5, 2013, the Defendant posted a false statement to the effect that “the sales of dental services is made by accessing the Internet website L by using a computer in the cross-disscam room located in the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City),” which read “the sales of dental services.”

However, the fact did not have the intention or ability to sell the Dominium.

As such, the Defendant, habitually, by deceiving the victim M, received 50,000 won from the victim to the Nong Bank account in the name of N on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1..

arrow