A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On July 20, 2018, around 22:35, 2018, the Defendant reported at the bus stops located in the front line of Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, that he was the subject of taking measures at the bus stops located in front of Seocho-gu Seoul, and sent to the Seocho Police Station C police box belonging to the police box of the Seocho-gu Police Station C and the police box E have broken the Defendant. “Neine”

This kind of release is the shoulder of the lock.

C. H. H. H. H. H. H. H.’s bath, and assaulting the face of the F. H. D on one occasion by drinking the F. H. H. E, thereby obstructing police officers’ legitimate execution of their duties for handling reports by 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (with respect to the upper part of the person under suspicion's right arms);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. The Defendant alleged that he was in a mental and physical state under the influence of alcohol at the time of the instant crime. However, in full view of all the circumstances such as the motive and circumstances leading up to the instant crime, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, even though it is recognized that the Defendant was in a state of drinking alcohol at the time of the instant crime, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

For the reason of sentencing, the Defendant’s crime of this case committed against a police officer in the course of performing official duties related to the processing of report 112 without any justifiable reason. The case is not less and less bad than that of the case, and the Defendant has been punished by a fine in 2008 and 2013, but again committed the crime of this case in the same manner, and is more favorable circumstances, such as the Defendant’s personality and behavior, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime.