1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on January 11, 2015 with the status of stay C-3 (short-term visit) of the Republic of Mameron (hereinafter “Mameron”) of the Republic of Mameron (hereinafter “Mameron”).

B. On October 17, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on November 3, 2016, the Defendant rendered a disposition for recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “profuges that there are sufficient grounds for fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

C. On November 9, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as on December 7, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was owned by a considerable size of land, but the Plaintiff’s external village was searching for the Plaintiff’s property.

On July 26, 2012, the Plaintiff’s outer village died of the Plaintiff’s parent due to a traffic accident, and on March 3, 2014, the Plaintiff died of the Plaintiff’s female on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s female was unknown.

In the event that the plaintiff returns to his/her home country, there is a concern that the plaintiff might be threatened with his/her life or physical freedom due to an attack against his/her external ginseng villages.

In addition, in the case of the plaintiff's Republic of Korea, there is relatively discrimination between South and North Korea using English, which is the plaintiff's Republic of Korea, and therefore the organization that claims separation independence of South and North Korea is formed, and the demonstration continues to exist.

The plaintiff.