Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 28, 2015, from around 02:00 to 03:00 on June 28, 2015, the Defendant, along with C, D, and E, possessed each seven card using the Trum card from around 02:0 to 54:00 each by using the Trum card from around 504 in Jeju, and then a person who possesses a card of the same number or the same pattern of non-satis in line with the agreed rules, such as setting up the card, in which the sum of the number of the card was set up or possessed is the smaller, the Defendant satisd by using the so-called “hulullar” in a manner that the satis in line with the agreed rules, such as setting up the card.

2. At around 03:00 on June 28, 2015, the Defendant assaulted G at one time at the same time, stating that “We would have been able to go to her seat?” in the process of arresting a police officer, such as Jeju East East Police Station criminal case of the Jeju East Police Station, and its affiliated G, etc., who was called “I would have come to go to her seat?” and “I would have come to go to her seat?” and “I would have come to go to her seat?” and “I would have come to go to her seat.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to criminal investigation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Each written statement of C, D, E, and H;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 246 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of gambling and the election of fines) concerning the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Although Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the nature of a crime for sentencing does not be somewhat weak, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant’s primary crime without any criminal power; (b) the recognition of criminal facts; and (c) the degree of tangible force that the Defendant exercised against a police officer, including the degree of gambling, and the scale of gambling; and (d) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, background of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.