1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

(a) deliver the buildings listed in the separate sheet;

(b) KRW 7,160,000 and as regards this, it shall be dated 2017.

There is no dispute between the parties, or it is possible to understand the contents of evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and the whole purport of the pleading.

On October 16, 2012, the Plaintiffs leased each of the buildings listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant building”) to the Defendant, with the lease deposit of KRW 6,00,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 770,000, and the period from October 18, 2012 to October 17, 2013, respectively.

The defendant did not pay KRW 1,00,000 among the lease deposit, and did not pay KRW 7,160,000 as of June 17, 2017.

On June 19, 2017, the Plaintiffs sent to the Defendant a letter verifying that the lease contract is terminated on the grounds of the delinquency in rent.

According to the above facts, the lease contract was lawfully terminated by the Plaintiff’s intent to terminate the contract on the ground that the Defendant did not pay two or more vehicles in arrears, thereby reaching the Defendant.

Therefore, the Defendant should pay to the Plaintiffs the unpaid rent of KRW 7,160,000 and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 15% per annum from July 7, 2017 to the day of full payment, which is the day following the day when the instant complaint was served.

In addition, from June 18, 2017 to the delivery of the instant building to the Plaintiffs, the Defendant ought to pay an unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent of KRW 770,00 in proportion to the monthly rent of KRW 770,00.

Although the defendant alleged to the effect that he was fully paid the rent, there is no evidence to acknowledge it.

The plaintiffs' claims are justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.