logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원홍성지원 2015.04.14 2014가단12140
물품대금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 30,000,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from July 1, 2012 to November 21, 2014.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff, as a steel retailer, supplied steel bars equivalent to KRW 70,00,00 for the construction of a new building on the land B, C, and C, the Defendant, on May 17, 2012, prepared and delivered to the Plaintiff on June 30, 2012, a written statement stating that “30,000,000 won for unpaid steel bars shall be paid until June 30, 2012,” which is either a dispute between the parties concerned or may be recognized by the statement under subparagraph 1.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff 30,000,000 won with 6% per annum under the Commercial Act from July 1, 2012, the day following the agreed payment date to November 21, 2014, which is the delivery date of the original copy of the payment order, and 20% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment.

The defendant asserts that he does not have the obligation to pay the unpaid contract amount because he is not the owner. However, according to the above facts and the purport of the whole pleadings, the defendant concludes a contract for supply of the contract between the plaintiff and the plaintiff, and it appears that the plaintiff was the party to the contract, and furthermore, as long as the plaintiff claims for the payment of the above contract amount, the defendant is liable to pay the above contract amount to the plaintiff regardless of whether

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

2. It is so decided as per Disposition by admitting the plaintiff's claim on the ground that it is reasonable.

arrow