All appeals are dismissed.

The Defendants’ grounds of appeal are also examined.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning of the judgment below and the first instance court in light of the evidence duly admitted, the court below is just in holding that the court below was guilty of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. due to the administration of Metecamination of Defendant L among the facts charged in the instant case, and violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. due to the sale and purchase of Meca Meca in Meca foreca foreca, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there is no error of law by violating the logical and empirical rules and by

In the grounds of appeal, the defendants' assertion that the court below erred in incomplete deliberation or misapprehension of legal principles as to the defendants' mental and physical disorder is not a legitimate ground of appeal, since the defendants' assertion that the court below did not consider it as the grounds of appeal or did not consider it as a matter

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. As such, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the Defendants, the assertion that the sentencing of the sentence is unreasonable

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.