The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly admitted by the court of first instance, which maintained the reasoning of the court below, the court below was just in holding that the court below convicted all of the charges of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. due to the administration of Metepta as of July 20, 2012, July 21, 2012, and July 23, 2012, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and there were no errors in the misapprehension of law by violating the logical and empirical rules and the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the reinforcement of the confession rules, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

In addition, pursuant to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.