1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the amount ordered below.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On February 25, 1971, the Plaintiff completed the marriage report with C (D) and on February 25, 1971, and thereafter, he was born as E (F birth), G (H birth), and I (J birth).

B. From around 1988, C established and operated “K”, a welfare facility for intellectual disabled persons, and three women, a intellectual disabled person, were living together with “K” from around that time.

C. The Plaintiff: (a) visited K from the beginning of 2000 to the beginning of 2012 to the beginning of 2000 to the end of 2012, visited C and I met with K; and (b) did so together with I in K to the end of 1988.

In addition, during the above period, the plaintiff continued to attend C's househousehousehouse for the above period, and C paid 70,000 won to the plaintiff as living expenses.

Around April 2010, the Defendant was employed as an assistant nurse at K, and began with C from July 201 to July 201, and thereafter, on March 21, 2012, the Defendant gave birth of L to a person other than the mixed.

E. The Plaintiff’s mother and female E worked in K from February 2012 to July 2013, 2013. The Plaintiff visited “K” more frequently than before the Plaintiff’s work in K. In such a process, the Defendant also naturally viewed the Plaintiff, who is the wife of C.

F. On July 18, 2013, the Defendant sent to C a text message to the effect that “When she shows L, he/she affixs a letter of divorce at a fixed rate. An inbound consciousness is not suitable for the growth environment.”

G. Around June 2013, the relationship between C and the Defendant was discovered to the Plaintiff, etc., and the Plaintiff filed a complaint against C and the Defendant as a crime of adultery around October 2013. On the other hand, the Plaintiff brought a lawsuit against C seeking divorce, division of property, and payment of consolation money, and payment of consolation money against the Defendant.

H. C: (a) On November 26, 2013, the Plaintiff prepared a letter of commitment performance (No. 1; hereinafter “instant letter of commitment performance”) with the following terms and conditions between the Plaintiff and a notary public is the law firm on the same day.