A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2016. 7. 28. 22:10경 충남 서천군 B에 있는 C 운영의 D주점에서 맥주 4병을 주문하여 마시던 중 술값을 지불하지 않는다는 이유로 신고를 받고 출동한 충남서천경찰서 E지구대 소속 경위 F로부터 신분증 제시를 요구 받자 “나 이름도 없고, 아무것도 없는 사람이야”라며 담배 연기를 위 경찰관의 얼굴에 뿜고, 담배를 꺼달라는 위 경찰관의 요구를 받자 ”야 임마. 내가 허락받고 피는데 니가 무슨 상관인데 좃같이 그래. 이거 개똘아이네”라고 하면서, 오른손 주먹으로 위 경찰관의 복부를 1회 때렸다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Evidence List No. 1);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, and all the conditions of sentencing recorded in the records, including the circumstances before and after the instant crime, shall be determined as follows.

The fact that a police officer's legitimate performance of duties is not good and that there is a power to be punished for the same kind of crime is against the mistake that the police officer's legitimate performance of duties is not good.