A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 29, 2017, around 22:57, the Defendant was viewed as a taxi engineer and taxi fee issue on the front side of the Changwon-si, Changwon-si B, Changwon-si. Around 22:57, the Defendant took a bath to ask questions about the circumstances of the instant case from the police officer D belonging to the police officer of the Mapo-gu Police Station C District of the Mapo-gu, Busan, who was called upon 112 after receiving a report, and called “sprinker is the superior.” On the front side of the taxi, the Defendant sawd the front door of the said D’s bridge from the front door of the taxi to the front door of the taxi, and continued to display the said D twice drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of the police officer's crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E and D;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do111, Jan. 1, 2011>