logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2012.09.26 2011고단1894
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 3 years and 6 months for the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes in the Gwangju District Court's net support on July 21, 2006, and completed the execution of the sentence in a wooden prison on October 13, 2009.

Criminal facts

1. Around September 2010, the Defendant received a request from the victim C to sell one set of 1 sheet and five half boxes owned by the victim’s name influort, which he stolen from B, from the mutual influort fluorites located in the Western-dong, Scambling-dong.

With knowledge of the fact that the above earb, etc. was a stolen, the Defendant sold to the owner of the above ear one set of 1 set and three half of earb, etc. from DD on September 25, 2010 to 307,000 won. On October 24, 2010, the Defendant sold one half of earb, etc. to the owner of the above earb, etc. from Emb, Emb, Emb, to 290,000 won. On October 29, 2010, the Defendant sold one half of 1 to the owner of the above 400,000 won.

As a result, the defendant arranged the transfer of stolens over three times.

2. Fraud;

A. A. On February 21, 2011, the Defendant posted a letter “Y” in the “G (H) Internet Game Packaging,” a class 9 item in yellow.

However, the defendant did not possess an item above and did not have an intention or ability to sell it.

On the same day, the defendant did not transfer the above item, which was promised to receive 500,000 won from the victim I to the Agricultural Cooperative (J) account under the name of the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On March 11, 2011, the Defendant posted a letter that 300 million won of cyber money equivalent to 2.10,000 won in cash to the above “G Game Packaging” (H).

However, the defendant did not have such cyber money as above and did not have the intention or ability to sell it.

On the same day, the Defendant is the cyber money from the Victim K.

arrow