logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015. 12. 04. 선고 2015누40929 판결
물적분할시 받을 어음을 미승계하여 자산양도차익 손금산입요건을 불충족한 것임[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Incheon District Court Decision 2014Guu2373 (2015.04.02)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High 2013 Middle 3306 (2014.06.03)

Title

It is not sufficient that the requirements for inclusion in deductible expenses are satisfied by failing to succeed to bills to be received upon physical division.

Summary

The instant bill, which is the asset of the division of synthetic resin, is not succeeded to a corporation established through division in the course of physical division, does not constitute an exception to general succession as prescribed by the above Acts and subordinate statutes. Thus, the instant division does not constitute physical division meeting the requirements under the subparagraphs of Articles 47(1) and 46(1) of the Corporate Tax Act.

Related statutes

Article 46 (Inclusion of Amount equivalent to Division Evaluation Marginal Profit in Loss of Corporate Tax Act

Cases

Seoul High Court 2015Nu40929 Revocation of Disposition of Corporate Tax Imposition

Plaintiff and appellant

Hoo Co., Ltd.

Defendant, Appellant

o Head of the Oral Tax Office

Judgment of the first instance court

Dismissal

Conclusion of Pleadings

November 6, 2015

Imposition of Judgment

December 4, 2015

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The defendant's disposition of imposition of KRW 1,690,954,270 (including additional tax of KRW 662,36,08) against the plaintiff on December 20, 207 (hereinafter referred to as "disposition of imposition of this case") shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;

This decision is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act, the Civil Procedure Act

It shall be quoted by the main sentence of Article 420 as it is.

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance shall be just and the plaintiff's appeal shall be dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow