Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 6 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On October 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) requested the 1st floor D convenience store attached to the “C” restaurant in Pyeongtaek-si B to purchase eight empty bottles; (b) on the ground that the said E does not purchase an empty bottle, one beer disease, which is a dangerous object; (c) went out of the convenience store; and (d) destroyed the door door door door door of the C cafeteria owned by the victim F, with the entrance of the above C cafeteria, by leaving the convenience store.

The defendant, carrying dangerous objects, thereby damaging property.

On September 9, 2018, the Defendant, at around 02:30 on September 9, 2018, ordered the repair cost of KRW 60,50,00 on one occasion when a computer monitor is drinking, on the ground that the computer was shot at around 02:30 on the 3rd floor, at around 8th floor of Pyeongtaek-si G building, and the victim H in the 3rd floor.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the property.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 2488"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. On-site photographs and investigation reports " 2018 Highest 1672";

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of on-site photographs and Acts and subordinate statutes reporting investigations;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 369(1), 366 of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing conditions of the Defendant’s age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime are determined by comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order and other conditions of the sentencing indicated in the record.

- Not only has the record of having been punished several times for the same crime, but also the quality of each of the crimes in this case is not good. - However, the damage from each of the crimes in this case is not much serious. - The defendant is against his mistake.