logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.04.13 2016고단6458
모욕등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 23, 2016, at around 22:40 on August 23, 2016, the Defendant damaged the property by putting a public bath at the main point in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, and putting the disturbance to the request from the victim E, the main place of business of the main place of business. However, the Defendant destroyed by putting the wind flag equivalent to 52,000 won at the market price of the victim’s possession at the above main place of business on the floor and harming its utility.

2. A special intimidation: (a) the Defendant was requested to request the disturbance from the victim E (the 61 year old), the main owner of the disturbance by avoiding the disturbance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), as described in paragraph (1); (b) 2 beer-cickers, which are dangerous objects located on the main floor; and (c) the victim said that the victim would be “the dead,” and the victim would be “the dead,” and (d) 2 beer-bes and two heads of beer-bes, and by committing any act to mislead the victim, thereby threateninging the victim to injure the victim’s body.

3. The Defendant interfered with the business of the victim E by force, such as avoiding disturbance over about 20 minutes, such as the date, time, place, and place described in paragraphs 1, 1, and 2, allowing customers who were the above main points to leave, thereby obstructing the victim E’s main points business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police to F and E;

1. Report on investigation;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 284 and 283(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. As to the Defendant and his defense counsel’s assertion regarding the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., sentencing in consideration of the following factors), the Defendant and the defense counsel were in a mental and physical state at the time of

The argument is asserted.

According to each of the above evidence, the defendant is recognized to have a certain degree of drinking at the time of committing the crime of this case, but this is therefore.

arrow