1. The Defendant’s KRW 28,770,00 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from March 14, 2014 to January 23, 2015.

1. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had supplied the fishery products, such as domestic fish, to the Defendant by December 31, 2013. According to the evidence No. 6, which is the transaction account book prepared by the Plaintiff, the Defendant asserted that the price for the goods to be paid to the Plaintiff is KRW 30,90,000, and sought payment therefor.

B. (1) According to the evidence No. 6 of this case, as of December 31, 2013, the Defendant’s price for the goods to be paid to the Plaintiff is KRW 30,900,000, among which the following should be excluded.

㈎ 갑제6호증에는 ① 2013. 1. 11. 1P를 1,560,000원에, ② 2013. 5. 31. 1P 300Kg을 8,550,000원, 2P 450Kg을 17,040,000원, 3P 120Kg을 4,860,000원에, ③ 2013. 6. 5. 3P 40Kg을 1,720,000원에, ④ 2013. 6. 15. 2P 100Kg을 3,800,000원에, ⑤ 2013. 6. 24. 3P 100Kg(북미산)을 4,000,000원에 원고가 피고에게 각 공급하였다고 기재되어 있다.

However, according to the evidence Nos. 2, 1,260,00 won, ② 8,460,000 won, ② 16,896,00 won, ④ 4,824,00 won, ③ 1,520,400 won, ④ 3,100,500 won, ⑤ 3,500,000 won, and there is no other evidence to prove that they were supplied with the value as otherwise alleged by the above plaintiff. As to each of the above transactions, it is recognized as being the value as stated in the evidence Nos. 2, 1,970,00 won [1,560,00 won - 1,260,000 won - 8,50,460,400 won - - 7,008,608,600 won - 1,005 won as stated in the above plaintiff’s evidence No. 2.

㈏ 또한, 갑제6호증에는 원고가 2013. 4. 16. 피고로부터 1P 100Kg을 3,000,000원에 공급받은 것으로 기재되어 있으나, 피고가 작성한 거래장부인 을제2호증에 의하면 3,100,000원으로 기재되어 있는 점, 갑제6호증에 의하여도 3,000,000원으로 기재한 옆란에 같은 필적으로 3...