The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Each document submitted by a defendant after the deadline for submission of the grounds for appeal expires shall be deemed to be within the extent of supplement in case of appeal.

In the written opinion of December 16, 2019, the defendant's defense counsel asserting misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles asserted that "The defendant's property benefits derived from the crime of this case shall be limited to the above amount, but the defendant's property benefits derived from the crime of this case shall be limited to the above amount. However, the court below's judgment that determined that the defendant obtained property benefits from the victim company." However, it is erroneous in the judgment of the court below that the defendant erred by mistake of facts. However, this cannot be viewed as a legitimate ground for appeal because it is asserted after the deadline for submission of the statement of grounds for appeal expired.

Examining this ex officio, the sales statement for C submitted by the victim company is stated as KRW 4,293,687,543 from October 2015 to September 2017, 2017 as follows: (a) the sales statement for C is stated as KRW 2,390,00,000 from supply of 4,293,687,543; and (b) the details of transactions for the customer director of the victim company are also consistent (2: 2:36-29 of the evidence record); and (c) the statement submitted by the defendant's attorney to an investigation agency is that the defendant failed to pay a transaction price equivalent to KRW 1.90,00 (2: 2:381 of the evidence record). Meanwhile, the director of C business has been stated as KRW 702,156,535, while C did not pay a price for the goods supplied by the victim company from January 2016 to the director of the above business office, and the court below did not err in its judgment.

Therefore, we can accept this part of the defendant's argument of mistake.