Defendant AB, AE, BA, AK, AL, AO, Q, AW, and AY, upon the preliminary claims added by this Court, are Daejeon.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this part of the underlying facts is the same as the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal as follows. Thus, it shall be cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

During the second seven pages of the judgment of the court of first instance, “The land of this case” shall be deemed to be “the land of this case” and “the co-ownership share of the defendant U and the acquiring intervenor and the registration status thereof” at the end of the same nine weeks on the same side: Provided, That the co-ownership share of the defendant U and the acquiring intervenor and the registration status thereof shall be the same Table.

B. It is as set forth in 18 above;

- On December 31, 1974, 8.79/475 shares in the shares of the Defendant Republic of Korea, - Transfer to E (the grounds of sale on March 31, 1959) - Transfer to F (the grounds of sale on December 28, 1974) - The entire F shares (4.87/475 shares) to F (the grounds of sale on December 28, 1974) - The portion of the shares of the Plaintiff transferred to the Plaintiff on May 9, 1978 (the grounds of sale on May 3, 1978), “IXX 2” was deceased from among the shares of the first instance court Decision 2(b) to the inheritance of the Defendant, and all of the shares of the Defendant-friendly 1/381/3 of the inheritance of the Plaintiff-Friendly 1/38, 1978.

The 3th 7th 7th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eths.

[Ground for Recognition: Unsatisfy facts, Gap evidence 1 through 3, Eul evidence 3

(i)each entry, the result of the commission of appraisal to the Daejeon East Deputy Governor of the Court of First Instance, and the result of the commission of complementary appraisal, the purport of the entire pleadings

2. U.S.A.