A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Special assaulting the Defendant: (a) around 07:20 on March 28, 2017, the victim D (37 years of age) who was an employee of the aged, around 605, in Gyeyang-gu Incheon Gyeyang-gu, was accommodated with the Defendant.

From E, “The Defendant has inflicted violence on one’s own goods in the guest room,” upon request, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s left-hand part of the cosmetics, which were a dangerous object that had been kept in the guest room without any reason, on the part of the reporter, on the part of the dangerous object, without any reason.

Accordingly, the defendant abused the victim by using dangerous things.

2. The Defendant was unable to avoid disturbance over about 50 minutes, at the same time and place as above, by gathering cosmetics owned by the victim F, who is the owner of the above telecom, and breaking a liquid, by spraying fire extinguishers, disturbing the floor, and taking a bath with a large sound.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property and interfered with the victim's business by force.

3. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at around 07:30 on March 28, 2017, to the police officer, who is a police officer belonging to the Incheon Gyeyang-gu Police Station G patroler G patroler in Gyeyang-gu, Incheon, who was reported within 112 on March 28, 2017, sent out, and called “pon flasium,” and “herb, killed during the police officer.” The Defendant voluntarily accompanied the Defendant to the back seat of the police station, resulting in a special assault, and went to the police officer I boarding the police station, who was on board the back seat of the police station.

The Si's fee, "after the beginning of the third to the drinking disability", and the fingers am over the hand, and 1, 2, and 3 am over the face of the I's own ambling hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties in relation to the investigation and suppression of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to D or I;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of the victim's non-damage photographs and CD (CCTV)-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;