logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.11 2016가단5171367
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by each person;

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On September 21, 2015, the Plaintiff: (a) around 00:06, around the officetel located in Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant assault case”) reported the Defendant’s left hand hand over to four seconds; and (b) assaulted the Defendant’s left hand hand over (hereinafter “instant assault case”).

B. The Plaintiff and the Defendant did not reach an agreement on the value of the agreed amount regarding the instant assault case. On March 9, 2016, the Plaintiff received a summary order of KRW 300,000 on the charge of the instant assault case, and the said summary order became final and conclusive.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1 and 2 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiff's assertion

A. After the argument of the instant assault case, the Defendant continued to respond to the Plaintiff or the Plaintiff’s request for the payment of excessive agreed money by making a phone call or sending text messages to the Plaintiff or the Plaintiff, and phone called to the Plaintiff’s office as an occupation soldier, but the Defendant informed the Defendant of the instant assault case, thereby impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation.

Due to these illegal acts of the defendant, the plaintiff sought compensation for damages because the plaintiff suffered serious mental damage to his status disadvantage that he could not apply for long-term service.

B. According to the overall purport of evidence Nos. 7 and 3 evidence and the oral argument of this case, following the assault case of this case, the defendant demanded a 5 million won agreement while continuing to contact the plaintiff or the plaintiff, and the defendant made a notification stating that "the plaintiff is a person who has committed sexual misconduct and violent crime. The plaintiff provided the plaintiff with his contact information while having known about the defendant's contact information. The defendant provided the plaintiff with his contact information, and then the plaintiff filed a complaint due to attempted assault, etc.," it is recognized that the defendant sent the notice to the domicile of the defendant's mother, and considering the circumstance of the assault case of this case and the degree of assault.

arrow