logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2013.12.05 2013고정127
업무방해등
Text

Defendant

A, Defendant B, Defendant C, Defendant L, and DefendantO are punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,000, and Defendant D, Defendant E, and Defendant E.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The E.S. S. S. A. H. S. A. branch of the subcontractor in an A.S. factory (hereinafter “A. A.S. branch of the subcontractor”) is a trade union organized by employees belonging to the intra-company subcontractor conducting the work of contracting in the S. A.S. after receiving an intra-company subcontract from S., and the wage increase including 90,982 won, which is a superior organization, through the R.S. trade union from October 6, 2010 to November 5, 201, and requires that all workers working for the subcontractor be converted into full-time employees, and pay the unpaid wages as of the date of the employee of the intra-company subcontractor to full-time employees. However, S requested a special negotiation, however, it refused the aforementioned demand to the effect that the workers belonging to the three-company subcontractors in the industry in the Asia and Ulsan may not become a party to the contract because it does not have a labor contract relationship with S. and thus, it cannot be a party to the contract.

On November 5, 2010, S Party subordinate labor union, including Asan-si subcontractor, applied for mediation to the National Labor Relations Commission through the Korea Trade Union, held a temporary representative meeting on November 8, 201, and formed a dispute resolution committee to supervise industrial action. On November 12, 197, the company passed an industrial action by voting for industrial action at the general meeting of the union members.

However, as of November 15, 2010, the National Labor Relations Commission applied for the mediation of the dispute filed by the Trade Union under the name of the Trade Union by the Trade Union under the Trade Union Act No. 2010 mediation53 on November 15, 2010 by the Trade Union and Labor Relations Commission as the employer, it cannot be readily concluded that there is a direct employment relationship with the workers belonging to the S and the subcontractor as the party to the dispute, and therefore, it is not subject to mediation.

The applicant shall recommend the adoption of other appropriate procedures under the Labor Relations Act.

arrow