Text
1. The decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on January 17, 2013 on the case No. 1962 shall be revoked.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Name 1 of the patented invention of this case: The name of the chief of the surface technical exchange EMI martic interbrance (e.g., unnecessary electronic signal or electric knbs interfered with the actions of other apparatus or systems. EMI macket functions, etc. to block these electronic devices. 2) / The date of priority claim / the date of registration / registration / the registration number: the date of March 31, 2008/ 68015/ 407: Defendant 4) / The scope of the claim for patent is 12 / the e.g., e., e., e., e., e., e.g., e., e., e., e., e.g., e., e., e., e.g., e., e., e., e.g., e., e., te.g., e.).
(B) At the stage of supplying ESI's dog b) the above selected EMI's dog b) the way of traffic using at least one of the JH and EMI's hedging, c) the EMI's dog block b) the above selected is placed at least one of the c) the c)eral surface of printed circuit board and the c) the eMI's dog block blick blick blick blick in the printed circuit board, and the eMI's clock blick blick blick blick bl, which includes at least one of the echerical surface of the EMI's blick blick (hereinafter "conck 3"), and the remaining part of the claim 1 and the part 3 of the claim b (hereinafter referred to as "the part 12 of the claim 2 of this case").