Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, a criminal organization, has been working as an organization of net civic director, and B, C, and D, from January 19, 2012 to March 14, 2012, opened a game room with the trade name of “F Gameland” in the underground space of the building located in the broad-scale E in the broad-scale E from January 19, 201 to March 14, 201, G as an employee in charge of exchanging He, as an employee in charge of exchanging He, as an employee in charge of planting He in the game room, and I was employed as an employee in charge of managing the place of business, and engaged in the game room

The Defendant decided to receive daily allowances from the above game room operated by B, C, and D, and received KRW 100,000 per day from January 25, 2012 to March 14, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 100,000 per day in return for the Defendant’s role of resolving the disturbance in the above game room, referring to the business department resolving the disturbance from around January 25, 201 to around March 14, 201.

However, the above game site was a place where 40 illegal game machines, which were modified differently from the contents of the screen composition of “scambling shop”, which was rated as game products by juveniles, and the game method, etc., the game site was operated in a way that many unspecified customers gain certain points and gain points on the screen, or lose points in accordance with the forest form, such as “float,” “float,” “float,” and “rash,” and the game money acquired by customers through the above game was operated in a way that exchanged KRW 9,00,000, excluding 10% of exchange commission per 10,000.

As above, the Defendant provided game products with contents different from the contents classified by the Game Rating Board B, C, and D for use, and aided and abetted the act by working as an employee of the above game site in order to assist him/her with knowledge that he/she is engaged in money exchange business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of the accused in the second protocol of trial;

1. Second prosecutorials concerning G.