The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Determination of the main sentence of the grounds for appeal is unreasonable;

2. The lower court determined that the sentence was chosen within the scope of the recommendation range set by the sentencing guidelines and the applicable sentencing guidelines (one year to one year).

The punishment was determined by comprehensively taking into account the details of the crime, the attitude and risk of the act, the degree of damage to the victim, the agreed circumstances, etc.

There is no error in the process of selecting the sentencing factors set forth in the sentencing guidelines.

Although victims wanted to take the defendant's wife in the appellate trial, the court of the original trial has already reflected this in the sentence.

Even if this court re-examines the sentencing factors and other factors of sentencing which are set forth in the sentencing criteria, the determination of the original sentence is inappropriate.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit.

The dismissal under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act is dismissed.