The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Determination of the summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment for six months) shall be inappropriate;

2. The lower court determined that the sentence was chosen within the scope of the sentencing guidelines set out in the sentencing guidelines and the recommended sentencing guidelines (two months of imprisonment to one year).

The lower court determined the punishment by comprehensively taking account of the method of crime, the scale of damage, the unagreement, etc.

There is no error in the process of selecting the sentencing factors set forth in the sentencing guidelines.

There is no change in sentencing factors in the appellate court.

(The amount that the defendant's family members paid in the appellate court shall not reach the level of considering the change in the sentencing factors. This court's decision of the original court that selected the lowest range of the recommended sentencing range is unreasonable, considering the sentencing factors set forth in the sentencing guidelines and other factors of sentencing again.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit.

The dismissal under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act is dismissed.