Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are simple mother and child, victim D is Defendant B’s Schedule, victim E is Defendant B’s children as victim D’s children.

The Defendants, by deceiving the victims who have difficulties in living to the extent that they are unable to pay electricity, had the victims take money by deceiving them, and had the victims receive money, and had the victims gather money by means of falsehood, such as “bet speculation and have contributed to money by investing in securities,” and “F President written 18 billion won in money collected by us due to the difficult financial difficulties of Ghana,” and accessed the victims.

1. Around November 2013, the Defendants’ co-principaled the Defendant’s house located in Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan City G2 that “The Defendant’s friendly third village of the Defendant A (one’s friendly third village in the highest place of the present vehicle) is in office, and the Defendant’s friendly third village of the Defendant A (one’s friendly third village in the same place of the present vehicle) changed the Defendant’s employment of the first son in the company.”

However, the so-called “H” did not have the intent or ability to find the victims’ large children in modern automobiles through the cost.

As above, the Defendants conspired to deception the victim as above and received KRW 500,000 from the victim for employment expenses around November 2, 2013, as well as receiving KRW 500,000 from the victim for employment expenses. From that time until March 25, 2014, the Defendants received KRW 333,370,000,00 in total, from March 25, 2014, under the name of employment expense funds, as shown in the attached list of crimes

2. Around July 2013, Defendant A’s sole criminal defendant sent a phone call to the victim E, who is a private village, at the above Defendant’s home, and gave a number of vehicles to the company. Around July 2013, Defendant A made a false statement to the effect that “A is going to the J having the head office in Canada, and the company gives a variety of vehicles at the company. One of them would change the consignment cost and the black boxes cost.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to reduce the difference to the victim because he did not receive the difference from the JJ company.

The Defendant is as above.