1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. According to the land survey book prepared in the Japanese colonial era, the land survey book stating that the F having an address in the Gyeonggi-do Yang-gun E was under the circumstance of the change of the administrative district and the conversion of 139 square meters of forest land in Suwon-si.

B. On August 27, 1959, Defendant Republic of Korea completed the registration of initial ownership, such as the entry of the purport of the claim regarding the above land.

The Korea Land Development Corporation completed the registration of ownership transfer based on land expropriation on October 20, 198 with respect to the above land on November 14, 1988. Afterwardly, the land partition was replaced on February 10, 1990 by the Suwon-si Gung-gu 462.5 square meters on February 10, 1990.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant land”). Thereafter, H, I, and J completed the registration of ownership transfer of the instant land in succession by H, I, and J, and Defendant B and C completed the registration of ownership transfer on the grounds of sale on June 11, 2007, as stated in the purport of the claim on June 11, 2007.

C. On May 3, 1925, F, the Plaintiff’s fleet, died, and succeeded to the property of H, who is his husband’s heir. On January 14, 1990, K died and succeeded to K’s property. L died on October 16, 2003 and died on October 16, 2003, and succeeded to the property of the Plaintiff A, M, N,O (P, Q, R’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s P, Q, R’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’s husband’

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, entry of Gap's 1 through 8, purport of whole pleading

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The alleged land of this case is a registration invalidation of the registration for the preservation of ownership in the name of the defendant B and C, which was completed on the land of this case, and the registration for the cancellation of ownership transfer in the name of the defendant B and C, which was completed on the land of this case and inherited by the heir such as the plaintiff et al. in order after the original acquisition by the plaintiff et al. after the plaintiff et al. was conducted under the circumstances of F, the plaintiff et al. sought the implementation of the registration procedure for the cancellation

(b) judgment;