The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal;

A. On February 2008, the Defendant stated to the victim E that “it may give employment to the victim E because he has a large number of people around,” or on March 2008, it does not mean that the victim is employed in friendly relationship with the chairman of the labor union in the current automobile, modern middle industry, etc. In order to be employed by the direct management company, there is no fact that the Defendant called “the labor management agency is required to find employment of 30 million won.”

On February 2, 2008, the Defendant heard from H that “A is in a fluent relationship with I’s labor head M, and there is a person who wants to be employed in the surrounding area because I sought an employee. However, the Defendant did not participate in the transfer of KRW 30 million from H to H by the victim, even though there was a enemy who sent the enemy to J., who is a woman of D. However, the Defendant was aware of the victim’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s her son’s son’s her son’s her son’s her son’s her son’s her son’s her.

B. ① The statement made by the victim E, consistent with the facts charged, was transferred to a bank account under the name of G, which is not the Defendant’s account but the employee of H management, and was transferred to a bank account under the name of G, which is the employee of H management, not the Defendant, on March 26, 2008, and later on December 13, 2012, which was four years later. The point of time was that the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the J on December 3, 2012, which was about ten days later, and that the Defendant was about ten days later, and that there was a high possibility of falsity in light of the J, the victim, and the relationship between the victim’s mother-child D, and the victim’s mother-child D, etc.