logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 의성지원 2013.09.12 2013고단170
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highest 170]

1. The Defendants violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint injury) around 00:20 on June 26, 2013, the Defendants were under the influence of the D convenience points located in the Gyeong-gun, North Gyeong-gun C, and were under the call of the victims E (age 31). The victims of the Defendant B, who were able to kill the victim’s bat, were under the call of the victim and went to the escape of the victim.

Accordingly, the Defendants drive away the victim, and Defendant A took part in the part of the victim’s bridge with a stone with a stone with a view to stringing the victim’s face once, and Defendant B took part in the part of the victim’s bridge. Defendant B took part in the victim’s bridge and took part in drinking.

As a result, the defendants jointly put the victim into the face face side with which the number of treatment days can not be known.

[2013 Height176]

2. On May 18, 2007, Defendant A’s violation of the Road Traffic Act (Driving without a license) and Defendant A was sentenced to a fine of KRW 7 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) at a sexual branch of the Daegu District Court on the same day. On November 1, 2010, Defendant A was issued a summary order of KRW 2.5 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) by the same court.

On July 23, 2013, at around 21:20, the Defendant driven a car without obtaining a driver's license in a section of approximately 300 meters from the front side of the spoppy restaurant located in the Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City), to the front side of the spoppy steel located in the same Eup at around 21:30 on the same day, and driving the car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.071%.

Summary of Evidence

【Fact of Paragraph 1 at the Time of Sales】

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. E prosecutorial statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Investigation report (the fact of paragraph (2) at the time of printing it);

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. Notification of the results of drinking control, and the register of driver's licenses;

1. Criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports, and application of statutes on rulings;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow