Defendant

All A and prosecutor appeals are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Comprehensively taking account of the evidence submitted by the prosecutor by the prosecutor of the facts-finding assertion as to Defendant B, even if Defendant B and the victim E (hereinafter “victim”) were recognized as having inflicted an injury with Defendant A, the lower court acquitted Defendant B on the ground that this part of the facts charged constituted a case where there is no proof of a crime, by misunderstanding the fact.

B. The lower court’s sentence (200,000 won) on Defendant A’s assertion of unfair sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (i) On March 18, 2013, around 21:50 on the part of the facts charged, Defendant A, at around 21:50 on March 18, 2013, went to dispute with the victim residing in the above apartment No. 1102, the above apartment No. 1102, and entered the victim's hand and her head debt, and the victim was able to take care of the body of the victim's head and her head debt. Defendant A, his mother, her head, her mother, took care of the victim's head. Defendant A, her head debt.

As a result, Defendant B, in collaboration with Defendant A, inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a divesalopic sect, which requires approximately 14 days of treatment.

⑵ 판단 ㈎ 원심은 그 판시와 같은 사정에 비추어 보면 검사가 제출한 증거들만으로는 피고인 B이 딸인 피고인 A에 가세하여 피해자의 머리채를 잡아당기는 방법으로 피해자를 폭행하였다고 보기 어렵고, 달리 이를 인정할 증거가 없다는 이유로 이 부분 공소사실에 대하여 형사소송법 제325조 후단에 따라 무죄를 선고하였다.

㈏ 원심 및 당심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들 및 기록에 의하여 인정되는 원심 판시와 같은 사정에 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 이 사건 당시 주로 몸싸움을 하였던 것은 피고인 A과 피해자였던...