logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
청주지방법원 2015.07.10 2015고정470
농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant, who is engaged in food service business (general restaurants) in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-si, shall not engage in any act of falsely indicating the place of origin or making an indication that may cause confusion as to agricultural products or processed agricultural products, while cooking and selling agricultural products or processed agricultural products.

Nevertheless, on December 24, 2014, the Defendant purchased KRW 125 km 1,125,00 from “E Livestock” located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si to purchase KRW 1,25 km 1,125,00, and stored approximately 50 g for one portion from the end of December 2014 to January 27, 2015, and falsely displayed the origin of KRW 1,300 (65 g) by making up for soup 1,30 for a soup to a large number of unspecified customers who find a business place, and the rest of 60 km was kept for the same purpose.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A statement of detection;

1. Copy of business registration certificate and certificate of business report;

1. A copy of statement of transactions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing exposed evidence photographs;

1. Articles 15 and 6 (2) of the Act on Origin Labeling of Agricultural and Fishery Products concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. A fine of two million won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the court below on the grounds of Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (it is obvious that the defendant had no criminal record on punishment against the defendant, that the defendant temporarily purchased the U.S. dollars but appears to have failed to correct the country of origin indication, that the defendant's mistake is recognized, that Canada's purchase price is flicker than the U.S. dollars, and that the defendant cannot be seen to have made a false representation to gain certain profits) or more.

arrow