1. The Seoul Northern District Court C (D) and E duplicate real estate auction case was prepared on June 5, 2015 by the above court.

1. The following facts may be acknowledged in full view of Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence Nos. 1 to 7, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

The Plaintiff filed an order for payment of credit card bills against F (Seoul Northern District Court 2014j20203) and filed an application for provisional attachment for the amount of KRW 18,681,719 on the attached real estate indicated in F-owned (hereinafter “instant real estate”) in order to preserve the above credit card payment claim, and the provisional attachment was registered on July 15, 2014, and the above payment order became final and conclusive around that time.

B. Meanwhile, with respect to the instant real estate on March 20, 202, the maximum debt amount of KRW 254,400,000 on March 20, 202, the right to collateral security, Seoul Bank Co., Ltd., the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security, the right to collateral security, the amount of KRW 150,00,00 on July 24, 2014, the amount of KRW 37,525,279 on August 13, 2014, provisional seizure, the creditor bank, the creditor bank, the creditor bank, the creditor bank of Korea on October 1, 2014, the voluntary decision to commence auction (Seoul Northern District Court) by creditor Bank on October 2222, 17, Y.

C. However, in order for F to be a director because it is difficult for F to reside in the instant real estate due to creditors’ demand for repayment, it is necessary to pay KRW 30 million or KRW 40 million, but the legal relationship of the instant real estate is complicated and thus it is impossible to lease the instant real estate through a real estate broker.

Accordingly, while explaining the circumstances that the Defendants are difficult to engage in the economic form of F and the fact that the auction of the instant real estate may be conducted, I mediated the lease of the instant real estate, one room among the instant real estate (four, one kitchen, one bath room, two bath room), and the Defendant A on September 15, 2014.