logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2017. 12. 06. 선고 2017누1522 판결
차용금이 아니라 부동산의 양도와 관련한 대가에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

District Court-2016-Gu Partnership-5086 (2017.05.10)

Title

not borrowed, but at the cost of the transfer of real property

Summary

(1) The total amount of income generated from the transfer of assets is defined as the transfer value of the assets. The "total amount of income" means all income acquired in return for the transfer of the assets in question, and whether it falls under consideration shall be determined by whether the economic substance is in a quid pro quo relationship with the transfer of the assets in question, regardless of the title under the principle of substantial taxation.

Related statutes

Article 94 of the Income Tax Act: Scope of Transfer Income

Cases

2017Nu1522 Revocation of disposition of imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff and appellant

Ansan-gu

Defendant, Appellant

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the first instance court

Jeju District Court Decision 2016Guhap5086 Decided May 10, 2017

Conclusion of Pleadings

October 25, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

December 06, 2017

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The Defendant’s imposition of capital gains tax of KRW 315,389,660 against the Plaintiff on January 2, 2015 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's explanation of this case is "the obligation of No. 6 No. 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance," which is "the obligation of No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance," but it is identical to the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance except for "the obligation of the court of first instance," and therefore, it refers to Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow