The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment shows the attitude of the defendant to reflect on the fact that the defendant recognized the crime, the scale of damage to each crime is minor, and some of the crimes are committed committed in favor of the defendant, but each of the crimes of this case was committed in favor of the defendant, and each of the crimes of this case was committed in an attempt to steal or steals property of many unspecified victims on five occasions, despite the fact that the defendant had been punished several occasions for the same crime, and did not agree with the victims up to the trial of the party, or did not recover damage to the victims. The defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for and six months from May 12, 2015 in the Daegu District Court Residential Support for the Daegu District Court on August 21, 2016, and committed each of the crimes of this case again during the period of repeated crime after the execution of the punishment was completed.

In full view of the above favorable circumstances and other circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the pleadings, even if considering all favorable circumstances for the defendant, it cannot be deemed unfair because the court below’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.