The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (two months of imprisonment and two years of suspended sentence) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant shows the attitude of reflecting his mistake while recognizing the crime, and the fact that the defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime is favorable to the defendant. However, the crime of this case is committed by deceiving the victim on a total of 67 occasions and taking the victim by receiving oil equivalent to the sum of 31,922,290 won, and the fact that the defendant did not agree with the victim or did not recover damage to the victim is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of the above favorable circumstances and other circumstances, such as the defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the pleadings, even if considering all favorable circumstances for the defendant, it cannot be deemed unfair because the court below’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.