logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2013.03.13 2013고단129
유해화학물질관리법위반(환각물질흡입)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 8, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year for the violation of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act at the Seoul Western District Court on February 8, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the official prison on December 8, 2012.

No person shall take in or inhale hallucinogenic substances which cause smoking, hallucination, or anesthesia.

Nevertheless, in order to solve stress, the Defendant purchased 2 pincoc tracocing agents containing luene, which are hallucinogenic substances, by eating the mind to inhale hallucinogenic substances, purchased 2 pinc tracing agents, which are hallucinogenic substances. At around 19:00 on January 10, 2013, the Defendant injecteds hallucinogenic substances by inserting the tracing agents at the home of the Ginnam-si, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, c 302, and inserting them at the entrance of vinyl d's plastic rocin and scinating them.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of inquiries, such as criminal records, investigation reports (a written judgment and confinement certificates), and statutes;

1. Article 58 applicable to criminal facts and Articles 58 subparagraph 3 and 43 (1) of the Toxic Chemicals Control Act: Selection of imprisonment;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. The sentence shall be determined as per the order within the scope of the recommended sentence (in the area of aggravated punishment for narcotics crimes No. 1) taking into consideration all the sentencing factors revealed through the evidence adopted and investigated by this court and the oral proceedings, taking into account the evidence adopted and investigated by this court, as stated in Article 48(1)1 of

arrow