logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.12 2018고정1637
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car with a vehicle B in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.

On May 21, 2018, the Defendant driven the upper vehicle at around 09:15 minutes, and changed the course into one-lane from the front side of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C, to the front side of a shot in front of the city.

In such cases, a driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely, such as making a well-round left and left well, securing a safety distance, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the damage to the right side part of the victim D (48 tax) driving in the same direction as the other part of the defendant's next left side of the taxi.

Ultimately, the Defendant by occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc., on the clocks, tensions, etc., on the part of the victim F (the 47-year old age), on the part of the victim F (the 47-year old age), on the part of the victim F, in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and on the part of the victim D (the 10-year old age), on the part of the victim D (the 10-year old-age) who was accompanied by the damaged vehicle for about two weeks of medical treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary measures after the accident) did not take necessary measures despite destroying and damaging the repair cost of the damaged vehicle to the extent equivalent to KRW 2,177,978 due to the occupational and practical course, such as Paragraph 1, and left the scene of the accident.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of each traffic accident;

1. Photographss of the fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s fluor’s photo;

1. An investigation report (related to suspicion of non-measures after an accident);

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant provisions of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Articles 148 and 54(1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act.

arrow