logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.04.28 2016고정71
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person driving a vehicle with C.

On May 5, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car around 17:00, while driving the car and driving it on a three-lane in front of the E-section 4 located in the Dong-gu, Busan Metropolitan City, Seoyang-si, and then changed the course to a two-lane from the 18-distance distance to the low-speed high-speed distance.

In such cases, the driver has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the vehicle, such as operating direction direction, etc. when changing the vehicle line, giving prior notice of change of course, and changing the lane.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and changed the two-lanes into two-lanes, and the victim F (W, 45 years old) who was in progress along the two-lanes, brought down the part behind the right side of the G NewD car, which was driven by the G NewWD car, with the top part of the Defendant’s passenger car.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as salt ties, tensions, and tensions that require medical treatment for about two weeks, and suffered injury to the victim H ( South and 15 years old) who was on board the damaged vehicle, such as salt drums, tensions, etc. in need of medical treatment for about two weeks, and suffered injury to the victim I (V, 47 years old) of the same passenger by the same passenger for about two weeks.

2. For the same reason, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act, on the same ground, was driving the said vehicle at the same time and place as the above paragraph, destroyed the victim F’s vehicle to have an amount equivalent to KRW 1,620,833, including the exchange of mobbbs-riers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning specifications of automobile inspection and maintenance;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow