A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months or more and twenty days of detention.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant 1301 of the 2016 Highest 1301, Jul. 29, 2016, the Defendant “Isked, Isked, Isked, and worked for, police officers E, etc. at the Sado Police Station D branch office located in C on July 29, 2016 without any justifiable reason;

I would like to find out the words "I" and "I" branch offices.

Fab, I wish to see that it is “D, by inserting Chewing fab,” and that police officers must return home on several occasions; and whether the police officers could not “I am, I am, and I am not on the face;

To start, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to see, to scarsh, and to scarsh, the police.

"Grash," and repeated shocks caused by civil petitioners, etc., were satisfying a disturbance between about 30 minutes.

Accordingly, the defendant had a very rough speech and behavior in a public office.

"2017 Highest 308"

1. On March 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) obtained the same amount of pecuniary benefits from the victimized person by failing to pay the taxi fare, even though the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the taxi fare because he did not possess any specified income at the time and did not possess any money; and (b) having arrived at I at the taxi operated by the Victim H while boarding the taxi operated by the Plaintiff; and (c) having arrived at I at I, a destination, of the taxi rate of KRW 19,600; and (d) failing to pay the taxi fare of KRW 19,60 to the said victim

2. On the same day, the Defendant continued to engage in a “L” restaurant operated by the Victim K, which is located at the 13:20 Scam of the same day, and the facts did not have the intent or ability to pay the food value, and did not engage in a breabbing. Notwithstanding the fact, the Defendant was issued food equivalent to the total amount of KRW 42,500, including the Plaintiff, etc., of the amount of KRW 30,00,000, 13:300,000 of the market price of the above damage, on the ground that “the Plaintiff, along with M real estate business entities, did not have any intention or ability to pay the food value, and did not engage in a breabing.”

3...