beta
Text
1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part shall be filed.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. A. Future Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Smi Construction”) newly built a studio building on the ground of Sastro-si. Among them, the gas construction portion was subcontracted to the Defendant amounting to KRW 5,500,000 on March 14, 2012.
B. On July 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) put the gas pipes influoring liquefied petroleum gas into the said studio building and the gas boiler installed in each household into the pipe pipe, and (b) supplied liquefied petroleum gas to the boiler by locked the gas pipeline side and the gas boiler respectively.
C. However, the gas boiler installed after the Defendant’s work was leaked by 19 cubic meters of liquefied petroleum gas from the gas boiler installed after the Defendant’s work, and under such circumstances, the Plaintiff was at the time of setting up a studio building 303 on July 10, 2012, and was used by the Plaintiff to set up a strawer to the living room mixed, and the Plaintiff, which caused gas explosion due to the electrical power source on the net liquefied petroleum gas emitted from the studio.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.
The Defendant was sentenced to a judgment of conviction of KRW 7,00,000 on December 7, 2012 on the ground that a person engaged in a gas supply facility business confirms the sound from gas, or checking whether non-snackers et al. were accurately wnded at a V by checking whether the gas was snicked, and then neglecting the duty of care to inject gas into boiler after taking measures to prevent gas from snicking out, and thereby making gas flow out (Chwon District Court Tong District Court 2012No963).
E. The Plaintiff, due to the instant accident, received hospitalization and outpatient treatment from July 10, 2012 to May 16, 2013 by suffering from scambling 2 to 3 degrees pictures, which require approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment. The Plaintiff, from the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service, received temporary layoff benefits from the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service.