A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 21, 2018, at around 16:33, 2018, the Defendant intruded into the said restaurant through the entrance of the public restaurant opened in front of the E cafeteria operated by the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, and the victim, and then 170,000 won in cash contained in the wall of the victim’s bank located on the table.

In addition, the victim's property was stolen in a way that putting the above bank into the main machine and bring it back to the main house.

2. A thief: (a) around 12:10 on June 24, 2018, the Defendant: (b) placed an order to enter the public restaurant F of the Heungdong-gu, Cheongju-si, and the H restaurant operated by the victim G, issued a food order; (c) placed one smartphone in the victim’s gallon, which is on the table table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement;

1. Contact of genetic assessment results, and response to on-site fingerprint assessment results;

1. Application of CCTV Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Articles 319 (1) and 319 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution: The conditions which include the same kind of criminal records and are advantageous to the fact that it appears that the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances before and after the crime, etc. are considered to be against the defendant's wrong, shall be determined as the same as the disposition, in consideration of the above circumstances.