logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 속초지원 2018.05.30 2017고단405
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the actual business owner of the “Eama treatment establishment” located in Sincho-si D. Defendant C is to receive KRW 2 million per month from Defendant A, and Defendant C is the “the chief director of the place of massage treatment” who registered the establishment of the place of massage treatment in his name around June 29, 2016, and Defendant B is to receive KRW 1.5 million per month from Defendant A, and is an employee at the place of the above business.

The Defendants, by setting their respective roles as above, recruited to arrange commercial sex acts for business purposes while operating the said businesses, and Defendant B, around January 5, 2017, planned to act as a broker for commercial sex acts. Defendant B, upon receiving cash of KRW 1.80,000,00, including the cost of massage and sexual sex acts, who was found to be a customer at the said businesses around January 5, 2017, provided the said F to the said business offices with a 302 heading room, and placed the said F in a state where sexual intercourse with G, a female commercial sex act in the said place, from around June 29, 2016 to January 5, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement made by the police in relation to G, F, and H;

1. Investigation reports (Analysis data for communication confirmation);

1. List and record of seizure;

1. A copy of a certificate filed for the establishment of the massage practice establishment, and details of each account transaction;

1. Application of control photographs, such as brokerage of sexual traffic;

1. The Defendants of relevant criminal facts: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; Article 30 of the Criminal Act

1. Selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A and C: Imprisonment with prison labor

B. Defendant B: Selection of fine

1. Defendant B who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A and C: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who observe the protection: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: The latter part of Article 25 of the Punishment Act, such as Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (Defendant A began to conduct business from July 2016 to August 8, 2016 at the time of investigation by the prosecution, and received KRW 180,000,000 from a customer who made a customer, 80,000,000,000,000

arrow