logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2015.10.15 2015구합64329
해임처분취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s dismissal disposition against the Plaintiff on November 25, 2014 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 1, 1992, the Plaintiff was appointed as a Local Machinery Officer, and was promoted to the Local Machinery Officer on February 7, 2003. From March 28, 2013, the Plaintiff served in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Police Agency Police Agency Information Service Equipment and Equipment Management System.

B. On November 25, 2014, the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff on the following grounds under Article 78(1)1, 2, and 3 of the State Public Officials Act:

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition”) The Plaintiff was in charge of the Equipment Management System B (hereinafter “instant gas station”) and provided 10 consecutive vacations and education for 10 days from July 7, 2014 to July 1, 2014 (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the instant gas station is aware that there is no substitute worker due to stress and the preparation of appeal documents due to disciplinary action against the Plaintiff, etc., the Plaintiff was in charge of annual leave from June 30, 2014 to July 2, 2014; (3) from July 7, 2014 to July 9, 2014 to the Central Public Officials’ Education Center; (4) the Plaintiff’s duty was 0 consecutive vacations and education for 10 days from July 7, 2014 to July 9, 2014 (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 1”); and (4) the Plaintiff’s duty was not directly in charge of the instant gas station’s duties on the ground that the instant gas station’s entry into 20-based and 18.

arrow