1. The Defendant’s disposition of dismissal against the Plaintiff on February 23, 2016 is revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details and details of the disposition;

A. From February 11, 2014 to January 29, 2015, the Plaintiff served as a captain of a police box at the Asan Police Station B police box.

B. On February 23, 2016, the Defendant took disciplinary action against the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 78 of the State Public Officials Act on the ground that “the following facts are recognized and they violate Articles 56 and 63 of the State Public Officials Act.”

(hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”). The Plaintiff, from September 2014, 201 to January 27, 2015, participated in the meals and drinking fields with 2 to 4 times a week, from September 27, 2015, the personnel management officer was issued, and the Plaintiff, from September 2014 to January 27, 2015, was required to comply with C’s intention, if the participants’ alcohol remains.

(1) On November 14, 2014, from around 19:00 on November 14, 2014 to around 15, 2014, three persons, and three persons, who were not in charge of drinking, and three persons, who were in charge of driving a knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife

(B) On January 27, 2015, following the first round of the police box around 22:00, the police box was transferred to a “Fsing room” in the vicinity of the police box, and the police box was put to a bad physical contact with the police box, and the police box was put to a brupt, and then the police box was put to a brupt, while carrying out an improper physical contact with the police box.

(hereinafter “A cause for disciplinary action”). (4) From September 2014, 2014 to January 27, 2015, a person was negligent in performing his/her duties, such as taking the second floor of a police box (ordinary 09:30-11:30) prior to the death of the police box (ordinary 09:30 to 11.30) even if the employee was on duty after completing his/her shift of duty on a very daily basis.

(hereinafter “No.S. Disciplinary Reason”) D.

On June 7, 2016, the Plaintiff appealed to the appeals review committee, and the appeals review committee dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim on the ground that “(2) all grounds for disciplinary action, except for the grounds for disciplinary action, are recognized and the amount of disciplinary action is appropriate.”

[Reasons for Recognition]