Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a management director of the D Housing Redevelopment Project Association, who has influence on the selection of the entrusted management company of the Bupyeong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E primary apartment.

F Around April 201, 201, F received a request from G Co., Ltd. Business Director H to introduce partnership-related persons of the Eth apartment, and if G is selected as an entrusted management company of the above apartment, it would have up to 30,000 won per household.”

On June 201, the Defendant introduced H through F from the Japanese colonial house in Bupyeongcheon-I, the Defendant received a request from him to “G to be selected as an apartment management company”.

On July 201, 201, the Defendant, at the lower parking lot of the apartment association’s office, presented the pertinent documents, such as the management operation plan submitted by the J, a competitor, to H. Accordingly, the said G was selected as an entrusted management company by submitting a written estimate of lower amount than J.

Accordingly, the defendant in collusion with H interfered with the selection of the management company of the above apartment by fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and F;

1. An interrogation protocol of F by prosecution;

1. A copy of each management plan, a copy of the comparison list of controlled entities, a copy of the meeting minutes of the 38th meeting, the defendant and the defense counsel asserted that, at the time of the instant case, the defendant did not interfere with the work by fraudulent means since the defendant participated in the bidding of four competing companies, including G, and the board of directors determined that G was an eligible company, and that the above company was selected as an entrusted management company.

In the crime of interference with business by deceptive means, the crime of interference with business causes mistake, dismissal, or site to the other party in order to achieve the purpose of the act.